Cinquin Lab

Center for Complex Biological Systems, Dev. & Cell Biology, UCI

Publications under the ‘Chick’ category

Understanding the somitogenesis clock: what’s missing?

Cinquin O. Mech. Dev. 124(7-8), pp501-517 (2007)

Abstract

The segmentation of vertebrate embryos depends on a complex genetic network that generates highly dynamic gene expression. Many of the elements of the network have been identified, but their interaction and their influence on segmentation remain poorly understood. A few mathematical models have been proposed to explain the dynamics of subsets of the network, but the mechanistic bases remain controversial. This review focuses on outstanding problems with the generation of somitogenesis clock oscillations, and the ways they could regulate segmentation. Proposals that oscillations are generated by a negative feedback loop formed by Lunatic fringe and Notch signaling are weighed against a model based on positive feedback, and the experimental basis for models of simple negative feedback involving Her/Hes genes or Wnt targets is evaluated. Differences are then made explicit between the many ‘clock and wavefront’ model variants that have been proposed to explain how the clock regulates segmentation. An understanding of the somitogenesis clock will require addressing experimentally the many questions that arise from the study of simple models.

A new method to transfect the hypoblast of the chick embryo reveals conservation of the regulation of an Otx2 enhancer between mouse and chick extraembryonic endoderm.

Albazerchi A., Cinquin O., Stern C.D. BMC Dev. Biol. 7:25 (2007)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The mouse anterior visceral endoderm (AVE) and the chick hypoblast are thought to have homologous roles in the early stages of neural induction and primitive streak formation. In mouse, many regulatory elements directing gene expression to the AVE have been identified. However, there is no technique to introduce DNA into the chick hypoblast that would enable a comparison of their activity and this has hampered a direct comparison of the regulation of gene expression in the mouse and chick extraembryonic endoderm. RESULTS: Here we describe a new method to introduce DNA into the chick hypoblast, using lipofectamine-mediated transfection. We show that the hypoblast can be easily transfected and that it starts to express a luciferase reporter within 2 hours of transfection. The validity of technique is tested by following the movement and fate of hypoblast cells, which reveals their translocation to the anterior germinal crescent. We then introduce a vector containing GFP driven by the mouse VEcis-Otx2 enhancer (which directs gene expression to the mouse AVE) and we detect activity in the hypoblast. CONCLUSION: The new technique for delivering expression constructs to the chick hypoblast will enable studies on gene activity and regulation to be performed in this tissue, which has proved difficult to transfect by electroporation. Our findings also reveal that regulatory elements that direct gene expression to the mouse AVE are active in chick hypoblast, supporting the idea that these two tissues have homologous functions.

Is the somitogenesis clock really cell-autonomous? A coupled-oscillator model of segmentation

Cinquin O., J. Theor. Biol. 222(4), pp459-468 (2003)

Abstract

A striking pattern of oscillatory gene expression, related to the segmentation process (somitogenesis), has been identified in chick, mouse, and zebrafish embryos. Somitogenesis displays great autonomy, and it is generally assumed in the literature that somitogenesis-related oscillations are cell-autonomous in chick and mouse. We point out in this article that there would be many biological reasons to expect some mechanism of coupling between cellular oscillators, and we present a model with such coupling, but which also has autonomous properties. Previous experiments can be re-interpreted in light of this model, showing that it is possible to reconcile both autonomous and non-autonomous aspects. We also show that experimental data, previously interpreted as supporting a purely negative-feedback model for the mechanism of the oscillations, is in fact more compatible with this new model, which relies essentially on positive feedback.