Cinquin Lab

Center for Complex Biological Systems, Dev. & Cell Biology, UCI

Publications under the ‘Mouse’ category

Understanding the somitogenesis clock: what’s missing?

Cinquin O. Mech. Dev. 124(7-8), pp501-517 (2007)

Abstract

The segmentation of vertebrate embryos depends on a complex genetic network that generates highly dynamic gene expression. Many of the elements of the network have been identified, but their interaction and their influence on segmentation remain poorly understood. A few mathematical models have been proposed to explain the dynamics of subsets of the network, but the mechanistic bases remain controversial. This review focuses on outstanding problems with the generation of somitogenesis clock oscillations, and the ways they could regulate segmentation. Proposals that oscillations are generated by a negative feedback loop formed by Lunatic fringe and Notch signaling are weighed against a model based on positive feedback, and the experimental basis for models of simple negative feedback involving Her/Hes genes or Wnt targets is evaluated. Differences are then made explicit between the many ‘clock and wavefront’ model variants that have been proposed to explain how the clock regulates segmentation. An understanding of the somitogenesis clock will require addressing experimentally the many questions that arise from the study of simple models.

Is the somitogenesis clock really cell-autonomous? A coupled-oscillator model of segmentation

Cinquin O., J. Theor. Biol. 222(4), pp459-468 (2003)

Abstract

A striking pattern of oscillatory gene expression, related to the segmentation process (somitogenesis), has been identified in chick, mouse, and zebrafish embryos. Somitogenesis displays great autonomy, and it is generally assumed in the literature that somitogenesis-related oscillations are cell-autonomous in chick and mouse. We point out in this article that there would be many biological reasons to expect some mechanism of coupling between cellular oscillators, and we present a model with such coupling, but which also has autonomous properties. Previous experiments can be re-interpreted in light of this model, showing that it is possible to reconcile both autonomous and non-autonomous aspects. We also show that experimental data, previously interpreted as supporting a purely negative-feedback model for the mechanism of the oscillations, is in fact more compatible with this new model, which relies essentially on positive feedback.